Tuesday, March 8, 2011
First Response: Realism
Fictional Character: Cleo 9-5 Response
Linklater Response:
Response to: Do the Right Thing.
David Cronenberg

Born in 1943, not much is known about Cronenberg's life, other than the fact that he was heavily interested in bugs as a child. Cronenberg states that he was inspired to take up film-making when, during his time in the University of Toronto, a friend of his by the name of David Secter directed and screened a film called “Winter Kept Us Warm.” After writing and directing two short films, Cronenberg went on to direct a number of smaller films, none of which gained any particular notoriety, until Shivers was criticized by a prominent film critic as being disgusting, repulsive, and, as it was made using funds from the Canadian government, a gross waste of taxpayer money. Although the ensuing controversy greatly hindered Cronenberg's film-making career for a long time, making it much harder for him to find funding for his films, one could argue that it also ironically made his career what it is to this day.
The films I will be describing, which are Cronenberg's remake of the classic 1958 film, The Fly, as well as the film adaptation of William S. Burroughs' novel, Naked Lunch, are both examples of various stages throughout his film career. One of the predominant subjects Cronenberg examines is psychology, and the mistakes humans make as a result of their natural desires and fears. In earlier films, such as the aforementioned Shivers and Rabid, Cronenberg explores how our advancement of science and the various ways we tamper with our bodies can lead to disaster on a large, even global scale. By trying to control the body, to make humans more aware of it in Shivers, and to keep it from dying in Rabid, doctors and scientists unwittingly unleash dangerous, disease-like organisms that threaten to overtake humanity.
In The Fly, though, Cronenberg marks the second phase of his films, where he strips down much of the chaos and allows us to explore how such changes affect people on a more personal level. Scientist Seth Brundle invents a revolutionary device which, with some significant tweaking, manages to properly teleport organic matter. To have the device approved by the company he works for, Brundle teleports himself to make sure that the method he found is foolproof. The problem is, he does this while his mind is clouded with jealous rage and copious amounts of alcohol, so he fails to notice when a fly makes its way into the pod with him.
And it is from here that the film introduces us to Cronenberg's bigger trademark. Cronenberg is widely known as the father of the “body horror” movement, a movement of stories in various media that take human beings and horrifically alter their bodies, often turning them into beings that are virtually indistinguishable from the humans they once were. In the case of The Fly, the consequences of having the fly merged with Brundle's DNA is what Brundle himself refers to as the “Brundlefly”-over the course of the entire movie, he makes a slow, agonizing transformation, wherein what appears to be an allergy rash slowly worsens, blisters and lesions forming all over Brundle's body to the point where his extremities are bloated and tumorous in appearance. His nails fall off, his hands and feet grow pads that allow him to walk on walls, and he has to puke an enzyme compound onto any food he eats, because it has become the only way he can eat it. Finally, Brundle's jaw detaches from his head, which promptly splits open and reveals a gigantic bug head underneath, and with his skin falling off to reveal a mostly insectoid body, the grotesque transformation is completed.
A few interesting things to note about The Fly are the context in which it was released, which had an impact on how the narrative was interpreted, and the steps taken to realize the iconic final transformation. The film was released in 1986, in the midst of the AIDS epidemic in the United States. When people saw the slow, grueling processes the fly transformation forced Brundle through, many of them saw the transformation as an allegory for AIDS. This, apparently, surprised Cronenberg, who had intended the transformation to be an overarching metaphor for general disease, aging, and death. Cronenberg also utilized a new technique to achieve the head-splitting scene; rather than use an air bladder, which was the standard at the time and becoming increasingly well-known amongst the public, Cronenberg chose to use an animatronic insectoid head constructed from a number of plates and springs, the force of which, when released, split open the more humanoid head.
While the majority of the film explores sex and how one man struggles to cope with a world alien to his own, Cronenberg does manage to sneak in a subtext of the consequences of body modification through drug usage. Bill's problems first arise from his wife's abuse of the very insecticide powder he uses on a daily basis... forced to confront her after running out of powder on the job and angering his employers in the process, he is eventually talked into taking a dose of powder himself. He is later confronted and arrested by a pair of detectives (Presumably after his boss left a tip that he may be stealing the powder). Using the powder as a segue, they introduce him to a cockroach creature, who first informs Bill of his standing in the agency, his wife's position as an agent of the opposing forces, and the existence of Interzone.
Later on, Bill discovers a drug known as black meat, which is produced from the bodies of giant centipedes (Another motif in the film is that centipedes appear frequently), and begins using it himself. Part of it is the pressures of the people around him, but above all, his use of the black meat is an attempt to cope with the frightening new reality he is being forced to accept. Even as he learns of the unfortunate side effects, namely withdrawal symptoms and sores that form wherever he applies the drug, he continues to use it freely. And if not a direct cause, the effects of the constant abuse of the drug do nothing to alleviate the mental breakdown he suffers as he is left by his friends and struggles to find someone, anyone, that he can trust.
Finally, at the climax of the film, drug usage is also portrayed as a means of slavery. Twice, the viewer has familiarized themselves with the Mugwumps, vaguely humanoid beings who, as the viewer has been told, secretes a highly addictive hallucinogen from glands protruding from their heads. As Bill enters the antagonist's compound, he finds a number of Mugwumps chained up and muzzled, with people who were assumed to have been jailed in a more proper fashion chained up nearby and continuously suckling off the Mugwumps' glands. There, they are left to spend the rest of their lives in unending bliss, but at the cost of their own freedom-their chains keep them from ever running away, and with the Mugwumps always freely accessible, they will never have the desire to.
The ending to the film also matches the endings to many of Cronenberg's other films. Upon finding Joan being held captive in the compound, Bill offers to defect from the agency to the antagonist's home country in exchange for her freedom. In effect, Bill is abandoning the very mission he was always intended to accomplish in exchange for a woman who reminds him very much of his deceased wife. He is exchanging security in a world he fails to comprehend for the last fragment of his former life, and, by extension, his sanity. Upon reaching the border, though, he is stopped by soldiers who, learning that he is a writer by trade, demand to see proof that he is what he claims he is. Rather than write something, though, Bill is forced to murder Joan in the same exact way he murdered his wife.
As he is allowed into what is essentially enemy territory, it becomes clear that, for all the things he has endured throughout the film, Bill has come out of it empty handed. His companions have either been murdered somehow, or traveled somewhere he can never go again. He has surrendered himself to the forces behind everything wrong with the new society, and the only thing he has to show for it is the corpse of the woman who would have helped him endure it all.
The Fly ends on a similarly somber note-as his condition worsens, Brundle finds himself forced to surrender to the primal instincts and insanity he has been staving off over the course of the film. In a last ditch effort to ground himself, Brundle kidnaps Veronica, his love interest throughout the film, and attempts to fuse himself with her, as well as his unborn baby, confident that this will help him to retain what remains of his humanity. The process is stopped by Veronica's ex-lover, though, who manages to deactivate the pod she is kept in just as the teleportation process begins. As Brundlefly attempts to break free, it is teleported with a sizable section of the pod, further mutilating its body as the two are fused.
Brundle, or what remains of Brundle, is reduced to a crippled, crude rendition of a cyborg, with bits of machinery and wire protruding out of its various extremities. If Brundle is allowed to live, it is all too clear that all its existence will be is a never-ending life of agony. Veronica is initially unable to deliver the coup de grace to Brundle, but with his last act of humanity, Brundle holds the barrel of the shotgun to his head, wordlessly begging Veronica to put him out of his misery. The last image is of Veronica collapsing to her knees in despair... she has not simply killed a creature, but her lover, the man she has fallen for over the course of the film and the man she fought so hard to save.
Cronenberg has stated that he is an atheist, and that he firmly disbelieves in an afterlife of any sort. Using this information to add further context to his consistently somber endings, it seems that Cronenberg presents us with an idea he himself has long since come to accept, that he almost demands we accept as well. The world is a cruel place, and the only thing that is lasting and consistent is chaos. Nothing you do, whether it be a scientific discovery you pursue or a life of virtue, can save you from your inevitable fate, or the turbulent forces of nature around you. In this world, the “good guys” do not always win, and more often than not, they actually find themselves punished for their efforts. And there is no “but” that can alleviate any of this, so live your life while you can, because once you die, there is nothing.
And in this, Cronenberg would again parallel with Kafka's work-Kafka himself continues to be notorious for his own series of somber stories with downcast endings. In The Country Doctor, the titular doctor's efforts to save a young boy from death only result in the ruin of his own life, which echoes the ruin of Bill's. His beloved maid is ten miles away, being violated by a perverted stranger with nobody to help her. Upon arriving at the house of the boy's family, the doctor found himself stripped naked and forced into bed with his horrifically wounded patient, who only grew more irritated at the doctor's presence. The boy's injury proved to be incurable and fatal, the only relief the doctor was able to provide being spiritual in nature. And now, after all of this, the demonic horses that took the doctor to the boy's village at an incredible speed move at a slow speed, hardly sufficient to bring the doctor back to his home, ten miles away, in time to save himself, much less the maid. And now, naked and alone, the doctor is left to regret the choice he made in attempting to save the boy: “Once one responds to a false alarm on the night bell, there’s no making it good again-not ever.”
Whether or not he is a modern-day Kafka, though, Cronenberg's work is very important. Cronenberg forces us to think. He forces us to re-evaluate our own interpretations of the world around us. He forces us to question the miracle cure of the day, from stem cell research to nanotechnology, and ask ourselves-”what's the catch?” And anything that forces us to think, in this day and age, is completely invaluable.
Martin Scorsese
Throughout his body of work, Scorsese repeatedly addresses such themes as identity, corruption, guilt, redemption, and violence. His protagonists are often social outcasts or pariahs; they may be corrupt, violent, or criminally insane. They have strong, turbulent personalities and are usually extremely flawed, elements which generally help to drive the plot. His films are frequently set in large cities, particularly New York, and often deal with corruption and violence in city life. Environment plays an important part in his films, with the grit and tension of the atmosphere greatly affecting the ‘feel’ of the movie. Visually, the camera work in his films is consistent; he is fond of mixing long tracking shots and slow motion with fast-paced editing of sequences. The unifying feature of Scorsese films is the way that he uses these elements to help the audience experience events in the same way that the protagonist experiences them, and to keep the viewer unsure of what will happen next.
Two examples of Scorsese’s personal style of filmmaking are Taxi Driver and The Departed. Both films take place in large cities – New York and Boston, respectively – and feature characters that live outside the confines of everyday social norms and rules. Both films also feature the steady decline of the main character’s mental stability as the plot progresses (Travis Bickle’s descent into depression and violence in Taxi Driver; William Costigan’s increasing paranoia and alienation in The Departed). Violence is a prominent feature in both storylines, as is a subjective, dreamlike quality aimed at involving the viewer in the protagonist’s emotions and experience, and heightening the suspense.
Filmed in 1976, Taxi Driver is considered one of Scorsese’s greatest films and sealed his reputation as a skilled director. Set in New York City shortly after the Vietnam War, the story revolves around Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro), an ex-marine who presumably served in Vietnam (although there is no real proof of this). Travis suffers from depression and insomnia. To cope with the sleepless nights, he takes up a job as a taxi driver working 12-hour nighttime shifts. He meets and becomes infatuated with a young woman named Betsy (Cybill Shepherd), a volunteer supporter of New York Senator Charles Palantine’s upcoming Presidential campaign. Feigning interest in the campaign, Travis develops a brief relationship with Betsy, which she ends after he takes her to a pornographic movie. Travis slides further into depression, showing disgust at the behavior of his fares. He becomes interested in weapons, illegally purchasing four separate guns and repeatedly practicing drawing them. He also meets a child prostitute called Iris (Jodie Foster) and tries to convince her to return to her family in the Midwest. After some time, it becomes clear that Travis intends to kill Senator Palantine during an upcoming speech. When he attempts to draw his gun on the Senator, he is spotted by Secret Service agents and chased from the crowd. Giving up on the assassination, Travis settles for killing Sport, Iris’s pimp (Harvey Keitel), as well as the bouncer in the brothel and the client in Iris’s room, becoming seriously wounded in the process.
The climactic shoot-out scene at the end of Taxi Driver has become one of the most remembered scenes in movie history. Several techniques were used to make this sequence feel dreamlike and to heighten the dramatic tension. The camera work used a mix of quick and aggressive back-and-forth cuts, long, slow tracking shots which follow Travis’s progress through the brothel, and slow-motion sequences. The set itself is dimly lit and rather claustrophobic; both the hallway (where Travis executes Sport) and the staircase are extremely narrow and confined. The struggle between Travis and the bouncer begins on the staircase and carries on into Iris’s room, where Travis shoots him point-blank in the head in front of the child. Afterward, as Iris sobs in the corner of the room, Travis tries to commit suicide. He clumsily works his way through his weapons, trying to find one with a spare round to fire into his head. The scene keeps this sort of slow tension as the police arrive in the doorway, aiming their weapons at Travis, who mimes shooting himself in the temple. The camera then assumes a birds-eye view and takes a long, slow drift throughout the brothel, down the stairs and out into the street, very deliberately panning over the massive amounts of blood spread throughout the house, and later over the crowds of people gathered outside who were disturbed by the noise. This eerie drift works well with the de-saturated colors in this scene; it emphasizes the dreamlike quality of the shootout and of Travis’s increasingly paranoid state of mind. The de-saturation of the shootout was done in an effort to obtain an “R” rating. As a result, the blood ended up being a much lighter, almost orange color. No matter the intent behind the color change, I personally found that the de-saturation worked in the context of the film. Grittier, darker, more realistic blood may have provoked a more visceral reaction to the scene, but I think Scorsese’s goal throughout the film was to involve the viewer in Travis’s near-fantasy world and the loss of touch with reality that provoked him to do this, and the strangeness of the coloring in the climactic scene only adds to that. Scorsese tends to pull the audience into the protagonists’ experience any way he can. Another way he does this is by manipulating the film’s score. There is no background music to accompany Travis up the stairs to Iris’s room; it only starts to play when the police appear in the doorway afterward. When it does kick in, it’s loud, sudden, and piercing (mainly played on horns). This seems to be a theme with Scorsese and musical scores: he is very aware of how music can affect the audience’s experience of the story. Without the blaring background music, the slow drift through the house following the shootout may have been an opportunity for the viewer to relax, knowing it was all over. Instead, the tension carries on long after everyone is dead.
The denouement following this sequence was also very interesting. A letter from Iris’s father is read aloud in a voiceover, explaining that the girl is home and safe, that Travis had been in a coma for an unspecified length of time, and that the family could not be more grateful for his actions. As the letter is read out, the camera pans over several newspaper articles cut out and pinned to a blank wall, all of which feature Travis Bickle and his heroism in the face of moral evil. I found it very ironic that the media touted Travis as a hero, considering that if he had been successful in assassinating the Senator, he would have been called a villain and a murderer. It was also interesting to see Betsy’s change of heart when she rides in the back of Travis’ cab; she no longer looks at him with disapproval. The sudden optimism of this final scene left me wondering if it was actually a dream; perhaps Travis was imagining himself a happy ending just before he died in the shootout. It just seemed too cheerful and optimistic in comparison to the rest of the film. Yet, that cheeriness is taken away almost as soon as it is shown. As Travis drives off and leaves Betsy on the sidewalk, there is a sudden noise, causing him to look sharply into his rear-view mirror at something the audience can’t see. This is a hint to the viewer that Travis is still not well and most likely will never be well. Scorsese’s characters tend to start out damaged and end up even more damaged. Very rarely does anyone get out unscathed. Scorsese’s later film, The Departed, is another example of this.
Filmed in 2006, The Departed is a remake of the Hong Kong crime thriller Infernal Affairs, which was released in 2002. In the film, Colin Sullivan (Matt Damon) is recruited into the Irish-American mob by Frank Costello (Jack Nicholson). Costello sends Sullivan into the Boston police force as a mole for his criminal organization. Meanwhile, William Costigan (Leonardo DiCaprio) is an undercover policeman sent to infiltrate Costello’s group as an informant. Before long, both sides become aware that there is an informant in their organization; Sullivan and Costigan each try to discover the others’ identity without blowing their own cover.
The main theme of this film is the concept of identity and of mirroring. Both the main characters and their associates seem to be mirrored versions of each other, similar figures that happen to be associated with opposite sides. Sullivan and Costello mirror one another, as do the authority figures Costello and Captain Queenan (Martin Sheen); Costello is a father figure to Sullivan, while Queenan is a father figure to Costigan. Throughout the movie there are plot devices and twists that continue adding layers to these connections between the characters. Symbolism is also used to stress this point. There is a scene in the film where Costigan attempts to arrest Sullivan, chasing him through the streets of Boston’s Chinatown at night. At this point each man knows of the existence, but not the identity, of the other. This scene uses symbolism, lighting, and camera editing to further emphasize the concept of identity, and to stress that both characters’ identities are beginning to fragment as they pretend to be other people. There is a moment where Costigan has lost sight of Sullivan, and looks wildly around in all directions; he spots a wind-chime made out of small fragments of a mirror and sees his own face split into many smaller pieces, hinting at his own increasing alienation throughout the film, before noticing the reflection of Sullivan in the background. The lights from neon signs and the steam billowing from restaurants distort and envelop both characters during the chase. In fact, there is hardly a shot in this scene that does not hint at some sort of mirroring or distortion, whether it is the disproportionate shadows of the characters thrown against an alley wall or the exaggerated echo of their footsteps. Nothing appears the way it really is. This is further emphasized when Sullivan, thinking that Costigan is approaching him from behind a delivery truck, leaps out to stab him with a knife. Instead of Costigan, his victim is revealed to be an innocent restaurant employee taking out the trash.
Where Taxi Driver used de-saturated colors to emphasize the dreamlike quality of the shoot-out in the brothel, The Departed did not employ the same technique with its color palette. The blood in this film was very stark and realistic. However, Scorsese manages to inject the same surreal quality into a violent scene by using a different technique: slow motion. In the scene where Costigan meets with his superior, Captain Queenan, in an abandoned building, they are followed by a group of Costello’s men (Sullivan tipped them off). Costigan is forced to go down the fire escape in order to keep his cover; Queenan stays behind to distract the men. When he refuses to give up the identity of his informant, Queenan is then thrown from the roof of the building, landing in the alley at Costigan’s feet and dying on impact. This is one of the most effective scenes in the film because of the way that Scorsese chose to pace the sequence. The camera techniques leading up to Queenan’s death are quick and aggressive, cutting from one subject to another and employing restless, spiraling tracking shots which follow Costigan’s progress down the fire escape into the alley below. When Queenan is shown falling, only one shot is used: he falls into and out of frame in slow motion. After so many aggressive shots and camera movements, the sudden change of pace gives the audience time to let the horror and helplessness of the situation sink in. It also sets up a contrast between the fall and the impact. When Queenan strikes the pavement, it is brutal and graceless. There is a horrible noise, and Costigan is covered in blood from the collision.
Similar to the background music in the climax of Taxi Driver, The Departed employs various tricks with the score in order to heighten the impact of certain scenes. For example, there is a scene in which Sullivan is sitting alone in his office, looking at the cell phone that the (now deceased) Captain Queenan used to communicate with Costigan. Sullivan thinks that he is on the verge of finding the informant in Costello’s group. Throughout the scene, Gaetano Donizetti's "Lucia de Lammermoor" plays loudly in the background, an aria used several times throughout the film, including a sequence with Costello watching a live performance of the same opera. The aria continues until Sullivan flips the cell phone open, bringing the music to a sudden stop and heightening the tension of the moment. This abrupt start-and-stop technique was also prevalent in the scene with Costigan and Costello driving out to a warehouse to make a drug deal. Sullivan calls Costello to let him know that he is being tailed by two police cars. During the phone call, the Dropkick Murphy’s “Shipping off to Boston” is playing at full volume until Costello screams at Sullivan to get rid of the tail, at which point it stops abruptly. The volume of the music in this scene emphasizes Costello’s increasing belligerence, making the aftermath of his shout all the more jarring. “Shipping off to Boston” also appears at several other points throughout the film, and each time it starts and stops according to cues in the scene. The tendency for the background music to start and stop follows along with Scorsese’s abrupt shifts in pacing and editing; the overall effect is that the viewer is unable to predict what will happen next.
All of these effects are used to engage the viewer in the protagonist’s experience, setting up an emotional investment in that character’s fate. Establishing a connection with a character with debatable morality raises questions for the viewer: given the same circumstances, would their own actions be any different? Can the protagonist be seen as a hero, despite their dubious ethics? Scorsese has an interesting outlook on heroism, which can be seen in both of these films. Many similarities can be drawn between the characters Travis Bickle and William Costigan. In both Taxi Driver and The Departed, the main character spirals into a state of depression and alienation over the course of the story. Despite their flaws – one is an outright murderer, the other depressed, disaffected and paranoid – they each elicit sympathy from the viewer, simply because each character is trying, in his own way, to solve the problems around him. Setting characters in a hostile environment encourages understanding and empathy from the audience. In contrast to the actions of those around them, the protagonist’s morally dubious choices seem more righteous and justified than they would in a safer, friendlier environment. Their actions appear immoral – Travis Bickle’s decision to kill those he saw as responsible for Iris’s situation, or William Costigan’s last-ditch effort to regain his identity through blackmail – but it is clear that they are each trying to right a perceived wrong. In fact, both characters are touted as heroes by the end of each film (by people who only witnessed the aftermath of their actions, and had no idea what each character really went through). Scorsese’s take on heroism seems to be that the intent behind an action partly determines the morality of that action.
Martin Scorsese has a very recognizable style of filmmaking, which is evident throughout all of his works. Though the subject matter, time period, setting and implementation may vary, the same basic themes and stylistic choices are always present: violence, guilt, redemption, insanity and alienation. A Scorsese film is always recognizable as such.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Sofia Coppola
However, it was in 1989, that she co-directed her first film with her father, titled Life Without Zoe. It was a short film, part of an anthology called New York Stories. After this she went on to direct several films on her own; her first was Lick the Star, released in 1998. Two later films, which I’ll look at for this article are The Virgin Suicides (1999), and Marie Antoinette (2006). The Virgin Suicides was the second film both written and directed by Sofia. It is an American drama that takes place in an upper middle class suburb of Detroit, Michigan during the 1970’s. It tells a story about the suicides of five sisters and the obsession the neighbors (four boys in particular) have with trying to figure out why they killed themselves.
on accident while trying to avoid running into the school’s vice-principal. He had just come from his car where he was smoking pot and did not want to have to explain why he was not in class and also why he smelt like weed. So he ducked into the first classroom he came to and sat down in the first seat he saw. Lux was at the desk in front him. She turned around and smiled at him, and that was all it took. He walked past her in the hallway and he was dumbfounded when she did not even look at him. So, when he saw her in the theater hall with an empty seat next to her, he seized his opportunity.
This scene makes you feel unwelcome and nervous and little bit excited for Marie. She is a young girl sent away to marry a man she has never met. She is expected to bear an heir to the throne and not disappoint her family back home. She is expected to smile and make everyone happy, which she tries to do from the moment she gets to France. She is intimated at first at how unhappy and unwelcoming everyone seems to be to her, but she does her best to do what is expected of her.
Although Dunst plays two different characters in each movie, there seems to be some similarities. Being an Austrian Queen of France comes with its challenges just as being a young secluded girl in her teens. Each character is portrayed as young and beautiful with rebellion issues. Dunst’s character Lux wants so badly to
be allowed to do anything outside her house so she begins sneaking out, drinking and smoking cigarettes. Her character as a young Queen of France takes advantage of her role by spending lots of money, sneaking out to parties and keeping bad company. 


